Talk:North Korea and weapons of mass destruction
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the North Korea and weapons of mass destruction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. | |||
|
| Article policies | |
Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL | |||
Archives: 1, 2 | |||
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the North Korean ballistic missile program page were merged into North Korea and weapons of mass destruction. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A news item involving North Korea and weapons of mass destruction was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 2 July 2009. |
A news item involving North Korea and weapons of mass destruction was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 March 2012. |
North Korean nuclear capabilities, 2018[edit]
Latest updates for 2018 at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00963402.2017.1413062?src=recsys for use in updating this wiki as needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.246.254.12 (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
correcting an editor's blunder ...[edit]
" There is little of strategic value in Alaska that a North Korean missile could hit ... BlackMarlin (talk) 08:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC) " - hmmm, two airbases with 6,000 personnel at each base, three major army bases, SEAFAC ... 50.111.48.95 (talk) 22:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- I agree, Alaska has some obvious strategic value. No source was presented for this claim and it never made it into the article. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
A wrong phrase[edit]
"based off Korea Meteorological Administration"
I've changed it to "based on", but I'm still not sure whether it's a viable phrase. Something can be based on a material from somebody, but not on somebody. Should it be improved further?--Adûnâi (talk) 06:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- I think it's OK. "Based off" is colloquial.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Article should praise DPRK and its leadership for preserving their nation through obtaining MAD and not becoming past-tense states like the nuke-less Lybia, Iraq and Syria.[edit]
The blatantly negative attitude of this article is not encyclopaedic, but rather oozes of amero-zionist propaganda! All of us had seen what happened to the nuke-less nations of Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Lybia and what has been happening to Syria: all of them trumpled underfoot by imperialist invasions, hundreds of thousands of people killed, entire cities ruined by the dozen, anarchy of religious hatred and violence created. In contrast, the DRPK which successfully armed itself with nukes and IRBM/ICBMs has been living peacefully and is even respected by the imperialist-in-chief US president. Thus North Korea should be praised for becoming a nuclear power through perserverance, thereby using MAD to protect its citizens from My Lai style extermination and also preventing a war from breaking out in far-east Asia!
The american NRA says every single day that a well-armed (pistol carrying) society is a polite society. Yet, the capitalists who rule the world with their financial and military might condemn those who say a nuclear armed world would be a polite world and thus every nation, small and large, rich and poor must follow in the footsteps of the DRPK to arm themselves with nukes. Nuke-less countries are invariably razed from the face of Earth sooner or later, because their nuclear-armed invaders are immune to any counter-move by the international community. That is the truth coming from recent fate of the Ukraine and Karabakh-Armenia or in other words the NPT was a farce to begin with! In light of these developments the article shall praise DPRK and the wisdom of their Kim leaders for securing the present and future of their country. In contrast, the war to raze non-nuclear armed Iran bck to the stone ages is just about to break out before 20 Jan 2021. 84.236.83.221 (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral: see WP:NPOV. The article should neither condemn nor praise. Please identify the text that you think is unencyclopedic or biased.--Jack Upland (talk) 18:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class Korea-related articles
- High-importance Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea North Korea working group
- WikiProject Korea articles
- B-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- B-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- B-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- B-Class Korean military history articles
- Korean military history task force articles
- B-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- B-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- B-Class military history articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles
No comments:
Post a Comment