Talk:North Korea and weapons of mass destruction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

North Korean nuclear capabilities, 2018[edit]

Latest updates for 2018 at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00963402.2017.1413062?src=recsys for use in updating this wiki as needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.246.254.12 (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

correcting an editor's blunder ...[edit]

" There is little of strategic value in Alaska that a North Korean missile could hit ... BlackMarlin (talk) 08:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC) " - hmmm, two airbases with 6,000 personnel at each base, three major army bases, SEAFAC ... 50.111.48.95 (talk) 22:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree, Alaska has some obvious strategic value. No source was presented for this claim and it never made it into the article. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 23:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

A wrong phrase[edit]

"based off Korea Meteorological Administration"
I've changed it to "based on", but I'm still not sure whether it's a viable phrase. Something can be based on a material from somebody, but not on somebody. Should it be improved further?--Adûnâi (talk) 06:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

I think it's OK. "Based off" is colloquial.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Article should praise DPRK and its leadership for preserving their nation through obtaining MAD and not becoming past-tense states like the nuke-less Lybia, Iraq and Syria.[edit]

The blatantly negative attitude of this article is not encyclopaedic, but rather oozes of amero-zionist propaganda! All of us had seen what happened to the nuke-less nations of Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Lybia and what has been happening to Syria: all of them trumpled underfoot by imperialist invasions, hundreds of thousands of people killed, entire cities ruined by the dozen, anarchy of religious hatred and violence created. In contrast, the DRPK which successfully armed itself with nukes and IRBM/ICBMs has been living peacefully and is even respected by the imperialist-in-chief US president. Thus North Korea should be praised for becoming a nuclear power through perserverance, thereby using MAD to protect its citizens from My Lai style extermination and also preventing a war from breaking out in far-east Asia!

The american NRA says every single day that a well-armed (pistol carrying) society is a polite society. Yet, the capitalists who rule the world with their financial and military might condemn those who say a nuclear armed world would be a polite world and thus every nation, small and large, rich and poor must follow in the footsteps of the DRPK to arm themselves with nukes. Nuke-less countries are invariably razed from the face of Earth sooner or later, because their nuclear-armed invaders are immune to any counter-move by the international community. That is the truth coming from recent fate of the Ukraine and Karabakh-Armenia or in other words the NPT was a farce to begin with! In light of these developments the article shall praise DPRK and the wisdom of their Kim leaders for securing the present and future of their country. In contrast, the war to raze non-nuclear armed Iran bck to the stone ages is just about to break out before 20 Jan 2021. 84.236.83.221 (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral: see WP:NPOV. The article should neither condemn nor praise. Please identify the text that you think is unencyclopedic or biased.--Jack Upland (talk) 18:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)