Talk:Belief
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Belief article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. | |||
| Article policies | ||
Archives: 1, 2, 3 | |||
Belief has been listed as a level-3 vital article in Philosophy. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as C-Class. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 12 months may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Tag Response[edit]
As the author of the current merge will process the requested one in a similar fashion after a due interval. Lycurgus (talk) 23:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Draft of requested merge. Lycurgus (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Systems overview section removed by mobile IP edit[edit]
This was reverted before the merge. Spurious complaint asking for what was in the prior subsection. Lycurgus (talk) 13:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Spurious was wrong, complaint was substantive but action taken was overreaching. Lycurgus (talk) 13:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Etymology of "doctrine"[edit]
Sorry, but the word 'doctrine' derives directly from Latin 'doctrina', related to the verb 'docere' = 'to teach'. It's possibly indirectly related to Greek 'δόξα' if one goes back several thousand years and jumps branches in the Indoeuropean language family, but there's no direct etymological relationship. I suggest removing this sentence or using an English word that does derive from 'δόξα' such as 'orthodoxy'. I've therefore replaced 'doctrine' with 'orthodoxy' in the sentence.Tdbostick (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Belief. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061119081311/http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/russell0.htm to http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/russell0.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Belief. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121203144842/http://user.xmission.com/~fidelis/volume1/volume1.php to http://user.xmission.com/~fidelis/volume1/volume1.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Use of the word "truth"[edit]
The word truth is used a number of times. But it is nowhere defined or explained. Just one example is in the diagram at the head of the page. It seems to me that this diagram is meaningless without a definition or explanation of truth. (And knowledge for that matter) I think this constitutes a serious problem with this page. DouglasBell (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Use of the word tenanted[edit]
tenanted belief systems are difficult for the tenants to completely revise or reject.
I am not familiar with this use of tenanted, but when I search the phrase tenanted belief systems, I see repeated paraphrases of this Wikipedia article. Can a less novel term be substituted? / edg ☺ ☭ 00:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Assumption of empirical epistemology?[edit]
The first sentence of the article, "Belief is the state of mind in which a person thinks something to be the case with or without there being empirical evidence to prove that something is the case with factual certainty." seems to assume a certain, empirical epistemology. This strikes me as biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9580:3FF0:4D00:4183:E29:E7F9 (talk) 14:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Influence by emotions[edit]
Surprised to see article not even mention how emotions influence one's beliefs. Here's one reference[1]. I'll take a stab at writing it one of these days. BecomeFree (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Philosophy
- Wikipedia C-Class vital articles in Philosophy
- Wikipedia C-Class level-3 vital articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class epistemology articles
- High-importance epistemology articles
- Epistemology task force articles
- C-Class ethics articles
- High-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- C-Class philosophy of religion articles
- High-importance philosophy of religion articles
- Philosophy of religion task force articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Mid-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Version 1.0 articles
- Unknown-importance Version 1.0 articles
- Uncategorized Version 1.0 articles
- C-Class Version 1.0 vital articles
- Wikipedia Version 1.0 vital articles
- Wikipedia Version 1.0 articles
No comments:
Post a Comment