The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Opus Dei, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Opus Dei, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
This article on what is perhaps the most powerful organization in the Church has no mention whatsoever of the worldwide Catholic pedophilia scandal. Really? Nonukes (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I think the article need a 2018 update and maybe a portal with European freemasonry similar realities. Lawtheagoraphobic(talk) 22:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Lede section must mention controversial nature of Opus Dei to be NPOV[edit]
I restored the mention of the controversial nature of Opus Dei to the lead but greatly shortened it so because the lead need not completely duplicate the controversy section. NPOV requires that we at least mention the controversy over Opus Dei so that anyone just reading the lead knows about it, while leaving it up to them to read the controversy section if they want the details. I also made it clearer in the controversy section that Franco was a fascists for anyone not familiar with the history of the Franco Regime (The term "Francoist regime" does not properly convey this fact for anyone not familiar with who Franco was (or his politics). --2600:1700:56A0:4680:B944:ABBC:CAF3:A37C (talk) 22:03, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Names under which the Opus Dei operates during periods where they come negatively in the media[edit]
Escrivá de Balaguer repeatedly calls to work in secret, for example: "Be a man of God, but resemble a man of the world: remain unnoticed!" In regions where there is the news keeps reporting negatively about them, they just operate under different names. Wouldn't it be useful to make that list? Sincerely SvenAERTS (talk) 12:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
That sounds like another conspiration theory. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
No comments:
Post a Comment